"The Teacher's Talk" is almost always the first lesson of high school Chinese in all editions. As a long-lasting selection of ancient texts, in addition to being quite long, most high school students will have some difficulty in reading, and they need to read a lot of sentences. Besides the explanation, what exactly does the teacher want to bring to high school students living in the 21st century from Han Yu's "Teacher's Talk"? "Teacher's Talk" aims to criticize the ethos of scholars and officials in the mid-Tang Dynasty who were ashamed of following a teacher, and to explain the importance of learning from a teacher. Han Yu's strong language and use of contrasting examples are impressive.
Some teachers will use it in combination with situations in life to make students think about the attitude and meaning of learning. And I'm also thinking Special Database about the "Master's Talk" in addition to discussing learning, what other entry points can it have? So I thought of "Master's Talk" as a dissertation, what can be worth learning and reference. The three elements of the essay Before answering this question, we must first consider: what should a good essay look like? This question can be thought from the three elements of the essay. The three essential elements of an expository essay are arguments, arguments, and arguments. An argument is the point of view that the author wants to present in the article. Examples of arguments supporting these arguments. Arguments show how the arguments relate to the evidence.
These three are inseparable, so a good essay should have clear and consistent arguments, strong arguments, and logical arguments. If you use the analogy of cooking, the argument is the main meal, the argument is the side dish, and the argument is the cooking technique. A meal without the main meal has no soul, but without the appropriate side dishes and cooking techniques, it is difficu school students' autonomy." Although the final result of persuasion is not necessarily the same It will be successful, but it also uses other schools as an argument. The second version is much clearer and more specific, and is more supportive of the argument in favor of high school students ordering outside meals.